What the Ghoti?!

RSS

Double ReFrAcTiOn: IF IT DOESN'T KILL YOU

nads62665:

It doesn’t hurt me

Those devil eyes, eluding smile

and how it’s all screwed to hell;

the hearts you use and then dispel

You wana know… why it doesn’t hurt me..?

You, its you.

If it doesn’t hurt you

The things I choose to hold onto

It’s all the same. No more, no less

For in our minds, we…

Watching ‘The Great Gatsby’

Let me start off by saying that this is not a review. If we have to call it something, let’s call it the product of the misconception that my opinion of the movie matters to anyone. I don’t purport to know about the finer aspects of filmmaking. I am a massive fan of The Great Gatsby, and consider it one of the literary masterpieces I’ve had the privilege of reading, so of course, when I heard that the movie was being made, along with discovering by and starring whom, I was skeptical, concerned, and a bit annoyed.

Before going to see it, and having discussed it in advance with a few people, I made sure to discard all preconceptions about what I thought it would or should be. I ignored the fact that, while I’m one of the biggest Moulin Rouge fans you’ll meet, I certainly do not consider myself a Baz Luhrmann fan. But I didn’t want to be THAT guy, the chap who sounds like he’s quoting some snobbish, pretentious movie critic. I made sure to forget words like ‘bastardise’ and ‘nuance’. I simply went, with a lovely group of people, to go watch a movie.

And what an excellent movie I thought it was. While the first half in particular was just a clump of dazzling scenes put together and packed full of sensory assaults and snippets of seemingly important dialogue, as it progressed, it became quite a bit more.

Closer to its beginning, the screen jumped from scene to scene, character to character, and semi-witty line to semi-profound sentence, and was the standard Baz Luhrmann spectacle (which I acknowledge has its appeal in movies like Moulin Rouge). The drug scene was effectively the absinthe scene from Moulin Rouge, and the first Gatsby party was entirely reminiscent of the Cancan scene in Moulin Rouge. We can forgive that, though. He probably can’t help himself.

As it developed, though, we began to see the characters shine. Despite the ‘Baz Luhrmann-ness’ of the entire film, the cast was exceptional. Leonardo DiCaprio was probably the right man for the job today, I stopped wondering why Isla Fisher was cast, and, while it’s not something you hear anyone say ever, Tobey Maguire wasn’t at all annoying.

While I’d have preferred the entire movie to be less of a ‘spectacle’, a little less flash and dazzle, Luhrmann managed to capture the core story quite well, constructing the characters well enough, and at the least, grasping the love aspect of the story quite accurately. The soundtrack was absolutely amazing, but with some songs unnecessarily thrown in just to be different.

So all in all, I thought it a spectacular film. As an adaptation of the book, however, I don’t have as many good things to say. At least he got the beautiful love story down.

For those of you who haven’t read The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, let me describe it briefly. The book makes you feel as if you’re watching everything happen in slow motion, through a thick piece of glass. It is simultaneously intricately involved and completely detached.

The film didn’t at all manage to capture the subtlety with which the book tells the story, the complexity of the characters, or, most importantly, the several commentaries on society, both then, and in general. The book is full of dramatic events, but very little drama, which Luhrmann isn’t capable of conveying. I’m glad he didn’t try, though.

One last criticism: casting Amitabh Bachchan as Meyer Wolfsheim was a terrible idea. If the idea behind it was fun, then they should have done something… fun. The aged Indian actor was not at all the right fit for the important character based on Arnold Rothstein. Luckily, he didn’t feature much in the movie.

If you haven’t yet seen it, I’d recommend you do. It’s a fantastic movie. If you haven’t read the book, watch the film first, then do yourself a favour and explore the world Fitzgerald masterfully creates in the book. If you’re a fan of the book, watch it nonetheless. Just be sure to leave your appreciation for the book at the popcorn counter.

May 6

fer1972:

Photography by Adrian Limani

Here’s my latest creation. I struggled a bit (or more than a bit) with the mastering. I hope you enjoy it.

I’ve remixed Pompeii by Bastille. If you’re a big fan of the original, I am too, and apologise for bastardising it.

Why Paris Hilton is beating me at life

Whenever something significant happens, particularly when someone dies (or when I have some free time on my hands), I inevitably start thinking about the meaning of life. I don’t mean in the theistic way you may or may not be thinking of. Just in general. And each time I start thinking about this question, answers to which have been many and varied, I always, without fail, end up comparing myself to the most unlikely candidate: Paris Hilton.

It seems absurd, doesn’t it? Of all the people, out of a possible 7 billion I could choose, I choose Paris Hilton. Let me say from the offset that I’m not at all an admirer, and I consider her a particularly superfluous being. And yet, by many of the life-defining criteria we set, she is beating me hands-down.

If our objective is to leave some sort of legacy, and be remembered by generations to come, I’m pretty sure, despite whatever aspirations I may have, that Paris Hilton will be remembered by far more people for far longer than me. Being a rich socialite with questionable moral fibre and probably a fairly good agent will probably serve her in this respect far better than my pursuing whatever course I may choose. One might argue that she may not be remembered fondly, but for some, success is defined as being remembered, not necessarily as being thought of positively.

Yet, while we’re on the topic of being remembered fondly, what if it’s all about ‘touching people’s lives’ or whatever? I like to believe that I’ve contributed to bettering a few lives, some temporarily, some hopefully permanently. Maybe that means I’m winning at life. At least partly. Unfortunately, our dear friend Paris is almost certainly beating me in this department too. Yes, yes, she’s incredibly rich so it’s not a big deal for her. I’ve never been a fan of the concept of ‘it’s the thought/effort that counts’. Perhaps if that was based on a standardised scale of thought/effort to means/ability or something, I’d consider it, but as things stand, that’s nonsense. An improved life is better than an attempt at an improved life. So far it’s Paris - 2, Faheem - 0.

Of course, the way most people measure success, even if they’re horribly embarrassed to admit it to themselves, is financially. As my facial expression confirms every time I have to fill up my car, I’m not quite as well off as Ms Hilton. Nor am I as wealthy as she was when she was my age. Nor is it likely I’ll ever have her kind of money (despite my aspirations, once again). “But wait,” you may say, trying to be supportive, “she didn’t EARN that money.” I thank you for the attempt. It’s true that she hasn’t earned all of her money, but I’m pretty sure she has earned quite a bit, through her ‘acting’ and her rancid, fetid, stagnant bile (’fragrance’). Probably quite a bit more than I will. Three-nil to Paris it is.

Perhaps, maybe, somehow, in some way, it’s all just about fulfillment, and happiness, and self-actualisation. Or something phrased like that. I kind of hope it is, considering all of the above, but it wouldn’t be a very satisfying answer, considering how subjective that is.

Maybe that’s not the point. Maybe it isn’t at all about comparing yourself with an otiose billionaire heiress. Maybe I’ve just written that in for a less depressing conclusion. Either way, I hope that you win at life, whether that means beating someone (figuratively) or just by feeling that you’re winning. Maybe it’s a multiple of 24. I have no idea. Thank you and goodbye.

In case you were looking for some instrumental background-type music…

I did this cheapish remix/bootleg back in late 2011, but wasn’t sure about uploading it. Don’t be too harsh.

V Day

The dreaded (/much anticipated) day has arrived. The day when the single lonely hearts wallow in their solitude, the proactive halves of most relationships rush frantically to come up with something original and romantic, usually out of a sense of obligation to do so, the other halves wait with bated breath wondering what is to come, and the rest puff indignantly at the commercialisation of romance/the bastardisation of the day of Saint Valentine/the westernisation of their culture/some other sort of ‘-isation’ about which one can be sufficiently outraged. Splendid. I think I have a (rather unimportant and very opinionated) message for each of those groups.

To those weltering in their loneliness, don’t. Or if you really want to, don’t make it someone else’s problem. Yes, your loneliness seems far more poignant when so many more people are off being romantic than usual, but don’t delude yourself. You were just as alone yesterday, and will be just as alone tomorrow. Maybe one day you won’t be. Maybe one day you’ll switch category, change your take on the experience. Maybe you’ll decide it’s not an issue if you don’t.

To the lovebirds, those entwined in the throes of adoration and whatever, enjoy that. To those participating out of a sense of obligation, you’ll survive it. Probably. It’s been some time since I’ve had to deal with the whole shebang, but I still remember the simultaneous frustration/anxiety/confusion(/last minute panic). It’s one day. It usually seems to turn out ok.

And lastly, to the objectors. Perhaps you also fall into one of the former categories. Perhaps not. If you consider yourself (or describe yourself as) a ‘conscientious objector’, it’s quite likely that you aren’t. It’s quite likely you’re a knob. Or misguided. It’s quite possible, nay, probable, that you aren’t so much ‘conscientious’ as you are, in fact ‘far too vocal’, ‘obnoxious’ and ‘easily outraged’. Or not.

Some of you are quite right, there is a monolithic commercial rally around Valentine’s Day, in which all sorts of businesses capitalise on the celebration. That’s what businesses do. Capitalise. Funeral homes are businesses which are marketed heavily, but I’ve yet to hear anyone say “Oh I’m sooo against the whole funeral thing. Mourning is so commercialised, you know?” (Yes, I did think the stereotypical style was necessary).

If you’re incensed because of this bastardisation of the day of Saint Valentine, there are a few things to think about. Firstly, there are some alleged, unproven, links between the original Day of Saint Valentine and Greco-Roman traditions which were known to occur at a similar time of the year. The key words being ‘alleged, unproven’. Ring any bells? I think this point is sufficiently made. Secondly, Valentine’s Day is no longer particularly associated with its roots. It’s come wholly into its own. You’re welcome to celebrate the day as you wish, but leave this derivative, unrelated custom to itself. You’re not going to be able to change anything. Nor should you.

To those who find themselves in a huff about being surrounded by a tradition that you don’t identify as your own, lastly, have a seat. Take a breath and look around you. Globalisation is happening all around you. It isn’t some intentional process being forced upon us by some sinister puppet master. It’s the way life works. Cultures are formed and cultivated by intermingling, and now that’s happening to a much greater extent than ever before. You’re welcome to not participate. It’s entirely your prerogative. But don’t loudly exclaim that it’s being forced on you. It’s happening around you, yes. It’s being marketed, yes. But free will is free will (mostly), and seeing as you’re ‘so not mainstream’ or whatever, not easily swayed by the current, feel free to not be swayed. Don’t block others. That is all.

One thing most people don’t know or expect about me is that I’m a desperate (occasionally hopeless) romantic. Everyone has some sort of opinion about today. I know I have several, far too many of which I’ve already subjected you to. There are, however, a few things of which I’m close to certain. Sometimes people need an excuse for a gesture, be it a grand display or a tacky stuffed animal. Sometimes, although it may seem more like an obligation than an excuse, it results in the same outcome. An acknowledgement of love, be it a long-standing relationship or a budding romance. (I won’t get too mushy about all that right now). Whether others have capitalised on what is possibly a lost (or foreign) tradition, it’s here. It happens. Make the most of it. Enjoy it. Or bear with it. Or disapprove quietly in a corner. Have a good Thursday.